Examples of the very best abstracts submitted to the 2012-2013 abstract selection committee for the ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.

Examples of the very best abstracts submitted to the 2012-2013 abstract selection committee for the ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.

Sample 1: “Asserting Rights, Reclaiming Space: District of Marshpee v. Phineas Fish, 1833-1843”

From May of 1833 to March pay someone to write my paper of 1834, the Mashpee Wampancag tribe of Cape Cod Massachusetts waged an aggressive campaign to gain political and religious autonomy from the state. In March of 1834, the Massachusetts legislature passed an act disbanding the white guardians appointed to conduct affairs when it comes to Mashpee tribe and incorporated Mashpee as an Indian district. The Mashpee tribe’s fight to restore self-government and control over land and resources represents an important “recover of Native space.” Equally significant is what happened once that space was recovered.

The main topics this paper addresses an understudied and essential period in the history associated with Mashpee Wampanoag tribe. Despite a body that is growing of regarding the Mashpee, scholars largely neglect the time scale between 1834 and 1869. This paper looks while the Mashpee tribe’s campaign to dismiss Harvard appointed minister Phineas Fish; the fight to regain the parsonage he occupied, its resources, additionally the grouped community meetinghouse. This paper will argue the tribe asserted its power inside the political and physical landscape to reclaim their meetinghouse therefore the parsonage land. Ultimately, this assertion contributed to shaping, strengthening, and remaking Mashpee community identity. This research examines reports that are legislative petitions, letters, and legal documents to make a narrative of Native agency into the antebellum period. Note: This is a component of my larger thesis project (in progress0 “Mashpee Wampanoag Government Formation together with Evolving Community Identity in the District of Marshpee, 1834-1849.”

Sample 2: “Private Paths to public venues: Local Actors therefore the Creation of National Parklands within the American South”

This paper explores the connections between private individuals, government entities, and non-governmental organizations in the development of parklands throughout the American South. While current historiography primarily credits the government aided by the creation of parks and protection of natural wonders, a study of parklands in the Southern United States reveals a reoccurring connection between private initiative and park creation. Secondary literature occasionally reflects the necessity of local and non-government sources for the preservation of land, yet these works still emphasize the necessity of a bureaucracy that is national the tone fore the parks movement. Some works, including Jacoby’s Crimes Against Nature examine local actors, but give attention to opposition to the imposition of the latest rules governing land in the face of some threat that is outside. The importance of local individuals in the creation of parklands remains and understudies aspect of American environmental history in spite of scholarly recognition of non-government agencies and local initiative. Several examples within the American South raise concerns about the traditional narrative pitting governmental hegemony against local resistance. This paper argues for widespread, sustained interest in both nature preservation as well as in creating spaces for public recreation during the local level, and finds that the “private path to public parks” merits further investigation.

Note: This paper, entitled “Private Paths to Public Parks in the American South” was subsequently selected for publication in the NC State Graduate Journal of History.

Sample 3: Untitled

Previous generations of English Historians have produced an abundant literature in regards to the Levellers and their role in the English Civil Wars (1642-1649), primarily dedicated to the Putney Debates and their contributions to Anglophone legal and political thought. Typically, their push to increase the franchise and espousal of a theory of popular sovereignty has been central to accounts of Civil War radicalism. Other revisionist accounts depict them as a fragmented sect of millenarian radicals whose religious bent marginalized and possibility which they will make lasting contributions to English politics or society. This paper seeks to locate a Leveller theory of religious toleration, while explaining how their conception of political activity overlapped their religious ideas. As opposed to concentrating on John Lilburne, often taken once the public face for the Leveller movement, this paper will concentrate on the equally interesting and far more thinker that is consistent William Walwyn. Surveying his personal background, published writings, popular involvement within the Leveller movement, and attacks launched by his critics, i am hoping to claim that Walwyn’s unique contribution to Anglophone political thought was his defense of religious pluralism in the face of violent sectarians who sought to wield control over the Church of England. Although the Levellers were ultimately suppressed, Walwyn’s dedication to a tolerant society and a secular state shouldn’t be minimized but rather recognized as part of a larger debate about Church-State relations across early modern Europe. Ultimately this paper is designed to contribute to the rich historiography of religious toleration and popular politics more broadly.

Sample 4: “Establishing a National Memory of Citizen Slaughter: A Case Study of this First Memory Site to Mass Murder in United States History – Edmond, Oklahoma, 1986-1989”

Since 1989, memory sites to events of mass murder never have only proliferated rapidly–they have become the normative expectation within American society. For the great majority of American history, however, events commonly defined as “mass murder” have lead to no memory that is permanent plus the sites of perpetration themselves have traditionally been either obliterated or rectified so that both the community together with nation could forget the tragedy and move ahead. This all changed on May 29, 1989 as soon as the community of Edmond, Oklahoma officially dedicated the “Golden Ribbon” memorial into the thirteen people killed in the infamous “post office shooting” of 1986. In this paper I investigate the actual situation of Edmond to be able to understand why it became the memory that is first with this kind in United States history. I argue that the tiny town of Edmond’s unique political abnormalities at the time of the shooting, along with the near total community involvement established ideal conditions when it comes to emergence for this unique type of memory site. I also conduct a historiography of this use of “the ribbon” in order to illustrate how it offers become the symbol of memories of violence and death in American society in the late 20th century. Lastly, I illustrate the way the notable not enough communication between people mixed up in Edmond and Oklahoma City cases after the 1995 Murrah Federal Building bombing–despite the close geographic and temporal proximity of those cases–illustrates this routinely isolated nature of commemorating mass murder and starkly renders the surprising wide range of aesthetic similarities why these memory sites share.

Sample 5: “Roman Urns and Sarcophagi: The Quest for Postmortem Identity throughout the Pax Romana”

“I am, the answer is ash and burnt embers;” thus read an anonymous early Roman’s burial inscription if you want to know who. The Romans dealt with death in a variety of ways which incorporated a selection of cultural conventions and beliefs–or non-beliefs as with the case associated with the “ash and embers.” Because of the turn associated with first century for this era, the Romans practiced cremation almost exclusively–as the laconic eloquence associated with the anonymous Roman also succinctly explained. Cremation vanished by the next century, replaced by the practice of the distant past because of the century that is fifth. Burial first started to take hold within the western Roman Empire throughout the early second century, because of the appearance of finely-crafted sarcophagi, but elites through the Roman world did not talk about the practices of cremation and burial in detail. Therefore archaeological evidence, primarily in kind of burial vessels such as for example urns and sarcophagi represented really the only place to look to investigate the transitional to inhumation in the Roman world. This paper analyzed a tiny corpus of such vessels so that you can identify symbolic elements which demarcate individual identities in death, comparing the patterns of these symbols to the fragments of text available associated with death within the world that is roman. The analysis concluded that the transition to inhumantion was a movement brought on by an elevated desire on the right section of Romans to preserve identity in death during and following the Pax Romana.